The Return of God & Future of Integral Humanism

A short tribute to Fred Dallymar’s work on Integral Pluralism

Fred Dallmayr (October 18, 1928 – June 5, 2024)

Introduction 

In recent years, my intellectual journey has been profoundly shaped by integrating contemporary psychological and philosophical theories into the framework of integral humanism. This ongoing research has led to a more inclusive and pluralistic approach, which I believe is essential for addressing the complexities of human development in the modern world. 

Evolution of Integral Humanism 

My exploration of integral humanism began with a deep appreciation for Jacques Maritain's original framework, which is deeply rooted in Christian theology and emphasizes the role of the Church in guiding temporal affairs. However, as I delved deeper into contemporary theories, I realized the need for a more inclusive and pluralistic approach. This led to the development of a new integral humanism that advocates for a hermeneutic of continuity and renewal, grounded in Catholic social teaching and the Church's commitment to integral human development. 

This new framework is informed by contemporary theories, including Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory and Fred Dallmayr’s work on intercultural dialogue and integral pluralism. By integrating various religious and philosophical traditions, this approach fosters a more systemic understanding of human development that is more inclusive and pluralistic compared to Maritain's original framework. 

Catholic Integralism vs. Integral Human Development 

In my recent discussions, I have also explored how my version of integral humanism differs from the integralism critiqued in

Kevin Vallier

’s book "All the Kingdoms of the World: On Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism." While Vallier critiques the traditional and hierarchical understanding of the relationship between the Church and the state, my integral humanism emphasizes inclusivity and pluralism. By integrating various religious and philosophical traditions, my approach fosters a more integral understanding of human development that is more aligned with contemporary theories and values. 

My new humanism is built on a Catholic and universal understanding of integral human development, rather than a political Catholic integralism. Although I appreciate Vallier's approach and critique, I believe he is still advancing a political argument that fuels polarization. Instead, I advocate for a universal argument based on human development. Ken Wilber’s differentiation of growth hierarchies versus dominator hierarchies provides additional support for this argument. Growth hierarchies promote development and inclusivity, while dominator hierarchies enforce control and exclusion. My integral humanism aligns with the former, fostering a more inclusive and adaptive framework. 

Jordan Peterson and Postmodern Conservatism 

In the realm of contemporary thought, Jordan Peterson has emerged as a significant figure with his critique of postmodernism and advocacy for a return to traditional values. Peterson's work, often categorized under postmodern conservatism, emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility, the value of Western traditions, and the dangers of ideological extremism. His approach has resonated with many who seek stability and meaning in a rapidly changing world. 

However, critics like Michael Brooks and

Matthew McManus

argue that Peterson does not pay enough attention to socio-economic problems. They contend that Peterson's focus on individualism and traditionalism overlooks the broader socio-economic structures that contribute to inequality and social issues. Peterson's critique of postmodernism and his advocacy for traditional values often fail to address the systemic and structural factors that impact people's lives. 

Moreover, Peterson's understanding of Ken Wilber's Integral Theory is limited. Wilber's model includes four quadrants: the interior individual (subjective), the exterior individual (objective), the interior collective (cultural), and the exterior collective (social). Peterson primarily focuses on the lower left quadrant, which deals with cultural and social aspects, but he neglects the other quadrants that address individual and systemic factors. This narrow focus limits his ability to provide a comprehensive analysis of contemporary issues. 

Matthew Shadle

, in his book "Interrupting Capitalism: Catholic Social Thought and the Economy," emphasizes the importance of addressing both individual and systemic factors in promoting human development. Shadle argues that a integral approach to human development must consider the interconnectedness of various social, economic, and cultural factors. This perspective aligns with Wilber's integral theory and highlights the limitations of Peterson's approach. 

Alignment with Catholic Social Teaching 

Despite not being explicitly Christocentric, my integral humanism aligns with Catholic social teaching through its emphasis on human dignity, solidarity, and the common good. Pope Benedict XVI's teachings, particularly in "Caritas in Veritate," provide a framework for understanding how my approach can be reconciled with Catholic principles. While Pope Benedict might encourage a stronger focus on the truth and love of Christ as the foundation for true human development, I believe that my approach can still align with the core principles of Catholic social teaching. 

Integral Facticity and Caritas in Veritate 

Integral facticity is in hermeneutical continuity with Pope Benedict XVI's "Caritas in Veritate" through their shared emphasis on a holistic approach to human development, recognition of human limitations, interconnectedness and solidarity, and the ethical and moral dimensions of human existence. Both perspectives advocate for a comprehensive understanding of human development that integrates various dimensions of human life and promotes continuous learning and adaptation. 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, the integration of contemporary psychological and philosophical theories into the framework of integral humanism offers a more inclusive and pluralistic approach to human development. By drawing on the insights of thinkers like Jacques Maritain, Ken Wilber, Fred Dallmayr, Michael Brooks, Matt McManus, and Matthew A. Shadle, this new integral humanism fosters a systemic understanding of human development that is aligned with contemporary values and Catholic social teaching. This approach emphasizes the importance of inclusivity, pluralism, and interconnectedness, providing a comprehensive framework for addressing the complexities of modern life. Through continuous learning and adaptation, integral humanism seeks to promote human dignity, solidarity, and the common good, ultimately contributing to a more just and compassionate world.