Revisiting my dialogue with Matt Segall on Michael Brooks & CIIS
Interview me next. I'll be happy to elaborate on what I think is glaringly lacking from Segall's work. I've also followed his work closely for years now. He's great. Love Matt. But wow do I have some issues with his presentation.
![Integral [+] Facticity](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!yhcJ!,w_120,h_120,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff8458843-3278-4fcc-accc-17ad21352205_1280x1280.png)
Interview me next. I'll be happy to elaborate on what I think is glaringly lacking from Segall's work. I've also followed his work closely for years now. He's great. Love Matt. But wow do I have some issues with his presentation.