![Integral [+] Facticity](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_80,h_80,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff8458843-3278-4fcc-accc-17ad21352205_1280x1280.png)
![Integral [+] Facticity](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,h_36,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff8458843-3278-4fcc-accc-17ad21352205_1280x1280.png)
Bridging Minds & Souls
Towards an Integral Humanism Approach to Cognitive Science
Introduction
This essay provides an update on my recent work and research, focusing on the integration of my theories of integral facticity, enactive fallibilism and integral humanism within the field of cognitive science. It also highlights some of the goals and applications of the Integral Awareness & Commitment Training (IACT) program at the Metapattern Institute and the significant influence of various thinkers on my ongoing intellectual journey.
Historical Foundations
The concepts of facticity and action have their roots in existentialist and phenomenological traditions. Martin Heidegger introduced the idea of facticity to describe the concrete details of human existence that are given and cannot be changed, such as our birth, death, and the socio-historical context we are born into. Jean-Paul Sartre expanded on this by emphasizing the tension between our facticity and our freedom to transcend these given conditions through our choices and actions.
Influential Thinkers
Over the years, my thinking has been profoundly influenced by a diverse group of thinkers. Richard J. Bernstein's work on pragmatism and hermeneutics, Jürgen Habermas's theories of communicative action and deliberative democracy, Ken Wilber's integral theory, Jacques Maritain's personalism, Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach, and Fred Dallmayr's political theory have all contributed to shaping my understanding of facticity and action. Ken Wilber's Integral Theory, particularly his AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) model, has been instrumental in providing a comprehensive framework for understanding human experience across multiple dimensions.
Development of Integral Facticity & Enactive Fallibilism
Integral facticity emphasizes the interconnectedness of various aspects of human existence, acknowledging that our experiences and actions are deeply embedded in a broader context of relationships and environments. Enactive fallibilism highlights the importance of recognizing the limitations of our knowledge and the need for continuous learning and adaptation. These concepts have evolved through my work to provide a nuanced understanding of human knowledge and action, bridging the gap between objectivism and relativism.
Practical Applications
The IACT program aims to demonstrate the practical relevance and impact of these integrated concepts by applying them to real-world scenarios in cognitive science. For instance, in the field of contextual behavioral science, enactive fallibilism can be used to understand how individuals adapt their behavior based on changing environmental conditions. This approach emphasizes the importance of flexibility and adaptability in navigating complex and uncertain environments. Integral facticity, inspired by Wilber's AQAL model, provides a systemic perspective on these adaptive processes, considering the socio-historical and cultural contexts that influence behavior.
Health & Recovery Advocacy
My journey in health and recovery advocacy has been deeply fulfilling and transformative. Over the years, I have dedicated myself to promoting integral human development, contributing essays and articles to Canada's recovery advocacy movement. Among my notable works are "A Canadian Perspective on Recovery Advocacy," co-authored with Bill White, and "Rethinking Addiction & Recovery in Canada."
My advocacy efforts have been profoundly influenced by Bill White and Ernie Kurtz historical and cultural insights, as well as Guy Du Plessis's application of integral theory to addiction treatment. These influences have shaped my understanding of addiction and recovery, leading me to develop the IACT program. The IACT program is grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) principles, which I have integrated with my own theories of integral facticity, enactive fallibilism, and integral humanism. This integration provides a comprehensive framework for addressing the multifaceted nature of addiction and promoting a systemic approach to well-being.
Application of IACT to the Fields of Addiction Treatment & Recovery
Psychological Flexibility: The six core processes of ACT—acceptance, defusion, present moment awareness, self-as-context, values, and committed action—are key dimensions of the IACT program. These processes provide a framework for enhancing psychological flexibility and living in accordance with one's values. By incorporating these processes, IACT helps individuals develop the skills needed to navigate the challenges of addiction and recovery.
Spiritual Integration: IACT emphasizes the integration of psychological and spiritual care, recognizing the importance of addressing both dimensions to promote overall well-being. This approach is particularly relevant for individuals in recovery, as it provides a holistic framework for addressing the underlying causes of addiction and fostering a sense of purpose and meaning in life.
Adaptability Across Contexts: The adaptability of ACT across different religious traditions, including Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, and Judaism, is crucial for the IACT program. This adaptability ensures that IACT can be tailored to fit the specific beliefs and practices of different faith communities, making it inclusive and responsive to the unique needs of individuals in recovery.
Evidence-Based Approach: The empirical foundations of ACT, combined with the philosophical depth of integral facticity, enactive fallibilism, and integral humanism, provide a robust evidence base for the IACT program. This evidence base reinforces the value of integrating ACT with spiritual care and demonstrates the effectiveness of IACT in promoting psychological and physical health.
Research & Collaboration
Engaging in interdisciplinary research projects with experts from cognitive science, philosophy, and other related fields is a key goal of the IACT program. Collaborative research can provide diverse perspectives and insights, enriching our understanding and application of these concepts. The Metapattern Institute's focus on digital humanities and integral humanism offers an excellent platform for such interdisciplinary collaboration.
Educational Initiatives
Developing educational programs and workshops to teach others about the integration of integral facticity, enactive fallibilism, and an integral humanism approach to cognitive science is a central objective of the IACT program. This could include creating online courses, hosting webinars, or organizing in-person seminars. These initiatives will help disseminate our ideas to a broader audience and foster a deeper understanding of these integrated concepts.
Online Presence & Digital Publications
Maintaining an active online presence through blogs, social media, and digital publications is essential for reaching a wider audience. Our blog posts and articles on platforms like Medium and Substack have garnered significant attention and engagement. Recent digital publications include:
"Rethinking Addiction & Recovery in Canada": This article, published on Medium, discusses the evolving landscape of addiction treatment and recovery advocacy in Canada, emphasizing the need for a holistic and integrative approach.
"A Canadian Perspective on Recovery Advocacy": Co-authored with Bill White, this piece provides an in-depth analysis of the recovery advocacy movement in Canada, highlighting key milestones and future directions.
Future Directions
Looking ahead, we aim to expand our publication and presentation efforts by:
Developing Comprehensive Training Programs: Creating training programs for spiritual care providers and mental health professionals to disseminate our integrated approach more widely.
Establishing Partnerships: Collaborating with faith-based organizations, healthcare institutions, and academic institutions to enhance the reach and impact of our work.
Expanding Research and Evidence Base: Continuously exploring new research avenues and building a robust evidence base to support the effectiveness of our integrated approach.
By following these strategies, we can effectively share our insights, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in addiction treatment, recovery advocacy, and cognitive science.
Conclusion
By following these steps, the IACT program at the Metapattern Institute aims to effectively integrate the concepts of integral facticity and enactive fallibilism with cognitive science, making significant contributions to both theoretical and practical domains. This integration, influenced by Ken Wilber's work and the evolution of facticity and action through existentialist and phenomenological traditions, will not only enhance our understanding of human cognition and behavior but also provide valuable insights for addressing contemporary issues in the digital humanities, health education, and political anthropology.